Skip to content

Conversation

@nolanpro
Copy link
Contributor

@nolanpro nolanpro commented Oct 8, 2025

Issue & Reproduction Steps

When importing a screen via devlink we get a 500 error when a dependent screen is missing

Solution

  • Ignore missing dependent screen instead of throwing an error

How to Test

  • Have a screen with a missing nested screen
  • Try to export a process that uses the main screen

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

@processmaker-sonarqube
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@nolanpro nolanpro merged commit e1d9637 into develop Oct 27, 2025
9 checks passed
@nolanpro nolanpro deleted the bugfix/FOUR-27169 branch October 27, 2025 18:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants